Comparison of Survivorship and Failure Modes Between Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Across Multiple Government Joint Registries for a Single Platform Shoulder System

[...]recent years have seen a dramatic shift in utilization of rTSA in which rTSA is increasingly used to treat OA in patients with an intact rotator cuff, with a corresponding decline in use of aTSA.1-5 The reasons for this shift in usage are multi-factorial but may be due to the perceived lower risk of revision surgery with rTSA relative to aTSA, as the quality of the rotator cuff muscles and tendon are not necessary for a functional rTSA but are pre-requisite for a functional aTSA. Furthermore, these registries have high rates of government-mandated compliance such that all patients are enrolled and very few patients are lost to follow-up, thus minimizing the potential for selection bias that is inherently present in nearly all nongovernment registry clinical outcome studies. [...]to better understand the relative differences in primary aTSA and primary rTSA usage and performance, we analyzed two different government joint registries for survivorship and for reasons for revision associated with one platform shoulder system and compared trends in usage of aTSA and rTSA over a period of over 10 years to elucidate reasons for any market trends. Additionally, reasons for revision and the cumulative revision rate were assessed across the government joint registries to quantify and compare the performance of this platform shoulder prosthesis for primary aTSA and primary rTSA in each country over the study period. Over the period of analysis, use of primary aTSA and primary rTSA with the particular platform system has increased year to year in both Australia and the UK, with the exception of a decline in 2020 and 2021 due to COVID-19.

Shifting the paradigm: ankylosis arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint with a novel collateral ligament reconstruction.

Silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis is rarely performed, partly due to the potential for lateral joint instability. We present our experience performing proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty for joint ankylosis, using a novel reinforcement/reconstruction technique for the proper collateral ligament. Cases were prospectively followed-up (median 13.5 months, range 9-24) and collected data included range of motion, intraoperative collateral ligament status and postoperative clinical joint stability; a seven-item Likert scale (1-5) patient-reported outcomes questionnaire was also completed. Twenty-one ankylosed proximal interphalangeal joints were treated with silicone arthroplasty, and 42 collateral ligament reinforcements undertaken in 12 patients. There was improvement in range of motion from 0° in all joints to a mean of 73° (SD 12.3); lateral joint stability was achieved in 40 out of 42 of collateral ligaments. High median patient satisfaction scores (5/5) suggest that silicone arthroplasty with collateral ligament reinforcement/reconstruction should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis.Level of evidence: IV.

Long-term survivorship and results in lower limb arthroplasty: a registry-based comparison study.

INTRODUCTION: Popularity of joint replacement surgery due to ever aging population surges the demand for a proper national joint registry. Our Chinese University of Hong Kong - Prince of Wales Hospital (CUHK-PWH) joint registry has passed the 30th year. The aims of this study are 1) summarize our territory-wide joint registry which has passed the 30th year since establishment and 2) compare our statistics with other major joint registries. METHODS: Part 1 was to review the CUHK-PWH registry. Demographic characteristics of our patients who underwent knee and hip replacements had been summarized. Part 2 was a series of comparisons with registries from Sweden, UK, Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: CUHK-PWH registry captured 2889 primary total knee replacements (TKR) (110 (3.81%) revision) and 879 primary total hip replacements (THR) (107 (12.17%) revision). Median Surgery time of TKR was shorter than THR. Clinical outcome scores were much improved after surgery in both. Uncemented of hybrid in TKR were most popular in Australia (33.4%) and 40% in Sweden and UK. More than half of TKR and THR patients showed the highest percentage with ASA grade 2. New Zealand reflected the best cumulative percentage survival 20 years after surgery of 92.2%, 76.0%, 84.2% survivorship 20 years after TKR, unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and Hip. CONCLUSION: A worldwide accepted patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) is recommended to develop to make comparisons among registries and studies feasible. Completeness of registry data is important and useful to improve surgical performance through data comparisons from different regions. Funding from government on sustaining registries is reflected. Registries from Asian countries have yet to be grown and reported.

The Projected Burden Of Primary Total Shoulder Replacement Surgery In Australia To 2035

Purpose: Lifetime risk estimates show that the use of primary total shoulder replacement (TSR) surgery in Australia has increased in recent years, but future demand for surgery has not been estimated. This study aimed to forecast the number of primary TSR procedures likely to be performed in the year 2035, and associated costs to the Australian health system. Method(s): De-identified primary TSR data for 2009-2019 were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Australian population data (by age and sex) to the year 2021 and population projections to the year 2035 (by age and sex) were obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Data on average episode of care costs were sourced from the National Hospital Cost Data Collection and private health insurer websites. Procedure rates to the year 2035 were projected according to two scenarios: Scenario 1 assumed that the rate of TSR remained constant from 2019 onwards, with consideration of anticipated population growth and ageing;Scenario 2 assumed a continued increase in the rate of surgery as seen from 2009-2019 plus anticipated population growth and ageing. For Scenario 1, age- and sex-specific rates of TSR in 2019 were calculated and applied to population projections for the years 2020-2035. For Scenario 2, negative binomial regression models (which controlled for age, sex, and year) were used to estimate TSR procedures for the years 2020-2035. For both scenarios, healthcare costs for 2035 were estimated for the projected number of TSR procedures, with average procedure costs for public and private hospitals inflated to 2035 Australian dollars using the Total Health Price Index. Result(s): The use of TSR increased by 242% in Australia from 2009 to 2019 for adults over 40 years of age (from 1,983 to 6,789 procedures). In 2019, 60% of procedures (n=4,062) were performed for females and 73% (n=4,925) were performed for people aged 60-79 years. Fifty-three per cent of procedures in 2019 (n=3,608) were performed for osteoarthritis. Under Scenario 1, the incidence of TSR is predicted to rise from 6,789 procedures in 2019 to 9,676 procedures by 2035 (a 43% increase), at an estimated cost of $AUD 317.69 million. Under Scenario 2, TSR incidence is forecast to increase to 45,295 procedures by 2035 (a 567% increase) at an estimated cost of $AUD 1.49 billion. Under this scenario, 69% of the total forecast costs (equating to $AUD 1.02 billion) relate to the private hospital sector. Conclusion(s): The use of TSR in Australia has increased substantially over a decade, which likely relates to a range of factors including improvements in prosthesis design, improved clinical outcomes for patients, greater surgeon proficiency, and expanded clinical indications for surgery. Under a conservative forecasting scenario, a 43% in the number of procedures is estimated to occur by 2035. However, under an exponential growth scenario that considers growth in TSR rates plus population growth and ageing, Australia would be facing a more than five-fold increase in TSR procedures by 2035. This would have profound implications for the healthcare budget and surgical workforce requirements. Future research is needed to model the impacts of COVID-19 on TSR provision and catch up of unmet need due to elective surgery restrictions and cancellations.Copyright © 2023

Supervised versus unsupervised rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are strongly influenced by the adequacy of rehabilitation and the consequent functional recovery. The economic impact of rehabilitation it is not negligible. Inpatient rehabilitation can be 5 to 26 times more expensive than the home-based rehabilitation. This topic is extremely relevant as the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of unsupervised rehabilitation in orthopedic surgery. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to investigate the scientific evidence regarding the comparison between supervised and unsupervised rehabilitation following TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following PRISMA guideline, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus databases using combinations of keywords and MeSH descriptors: "total "Knee replacement," "Arthroplasty", "Rehabilitation" was performed from inception to December 2021. All relevant articles were retrieved, and their bibliographies were searched for further relevant references. Only English written randomized controlled trials comparing supervised and unsupervised rehabilitation following TKA were included in this systematic review. The outcomes considered were long-term pain, physical function, knee flexion and extension ROM, 6 minute walking test (6MWT) and timed up and go test (TUG). RESULTS: 11 studies (2.181 patients in total) were included in this systematic review. The long-term pain outcome showed no significant differences (Std. Mean Difference [SMD] = 0.00, 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.16, 0.017) between the supervised (n = 397) and unsupervised (n = 255). Physical function showed no significant differences among the two groups (mean difference [MD] = 0.84, 95 % CI = -1.82, 3.50). Non-significant differences were also found for knee ROM flexion (mean difference [MD] = -0.46, 95 % CI = -2.95, 2.04) and for knee extension (mean difference [MD] = 0.54, 95 % CI = -0.89, 1.97). At the 52-week follow-up, the unsupervised group showed significant better results in 6MWT (mean difference [MD] = -26.10, 95 % CI = -47.62, -4.59) and in Timed up and go test (mean difference [MD] = 1.33, 95 % CI = 0.50, 2.15). CONCLUSION: This systematic review did not show a significant clinical difference in improving pain, function, and mobility outcomes after TKA between supervised PT and unsupervised PT. Therefore, it would appear that supervised rehabilitation did not had additional benefits compared to unsupervised rehabilitation.

[Outpatient care through cross-sector prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts in outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty]. / Ambulante Versorgung durch sektorübergreifende Prähabilitations- und Rehabilitationskonzepte in der tagesstationären Hüft- und Kniegelenkendoprothetik.

No appeal by a health politician, no matter how insistent, has ever forced all the operational structures of our health-care system to examine their own efficiencies and cost reduction potentials as has SARS-CoV­2. Fast-track surgery, developed long before the current pandemic, can become an indispensable element of modern hospital routines through the integration of interlocked care structures. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcome can be improved by significantly shortening hospital stays, decreasing complication rates, and by additionally strengthening the competence and motivation of the patients involved. Hospital staff could be relieved of heavy workloads, and overall costs could be reduced by involving external prehabilitation centers. It is now necessary to further develop standards for the establishment and implementation of appropriately coordinated prehabilitation and rehabilitation concepts for elective total hip and knee replacement surgery and, ideally, to save resources at the same time through regional networking and integration.

Patient Satisfaction and Interest in Telemedicine Visits Following Total Knee and Hip Replacement Surgery.

Introduction: Telemedicine is the practice of caring for patients remotely when the patient and provider are not physically present at the same location. Within orthopedic surgery, telemedicine offers care without the typical obstacles of an in-person appointment such as difficulty ambulating following surgery and patient wait times. In this study, we evaluated patient interest and satisfaction in postoperative telemedicine visits following hip or knee arthroplasty surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients were offered either a traditional in-person or a remote telemedicine postoperative visit following surgery. Patients were asked to complete a satisfaction survey following their postoperative visit regarding their experience. Patient-survey responses as well as patient-reported outcome metrics were captured using a mobile and web-based electronic patient rehabilitation application. Results: A total of 766 patients were included in this study with 360 offered postoperative telemedicine visits and 402 offered traditional in-person visits. Two hundred fifty-nine patients reported satisfaction levels with their telemedicine visit, with 58.3% of patients characterizing their feelings with the visit as "extremely satisfied," 32.0% as "satisfied," 8.9% as "neutral," 0.3% as "dissatisfied," and 0.3% as "extremely dissatisfied." A total of 713 patients reported how the COVID-19 pandemic effected their feelings toward telemedicine with 12.9% of patients characterizing the affect as "extremely positively," 33.1% of patients as "positively," 48.9% of patients as "neutral," 3.6% of patients as "negatively," and 1.4% of patients as "extremely negatively." There were no significant differences in the change between preoperative Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores/Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement, or Veterans RAND 12 Physical and Mental components and these values at 12 weeks follow-up and 1-year follow-up, respectively, in patients who had telemedicine visits versus those who had traditional in-person visits. Discussion: The results of this study demonstrate that the patients who decided to have a telemedicine visit during their postoperative visit were satisfied with their experience. Overall, COVID-19 had a positive influence on patient's feelings toward telemedicine visits.

Prior Diagnosis of COVID Has No Increased Complications in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Introduction Although a substantial portion of the United States population has been infected with and recovered from Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19), many patients may have persistent symptoms and complications from disease-driven respiratory disease, arrhythmias, and venous thromboembolism (VTE). With institutions resuming elective total joint arthroplasties (TJA), it is unclear whether a prior resolved diagnosis of COVID has any implications on postoperative outcomes. Methods All elective TJA performed in 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and a history of prior COVID+ result recorded. Baseline demographics, days from prior COVID+ result to surgery date, preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization, and laboratory markers were obtained to determine baseline characteristics. Postoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of revision surgery, and discharge destination were compared between groups. Perioperative and postoperative rates of VTE, urinary tract infection (UTI), pneumonia, postoperative oxygen supplementation, cardiac arrhythmia, renal disease, sepsis, and periprosthetic joint infections within six months of surgery were recorded. Results Of the 155 elective TJA performed in 2021, 24 patients had a prior COVID+ diagnosis with a mean of 253 days from positive result to surgery date. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative lab markers between groups. Surgeries on patients with a prior COVID+ had a significantly higher EBL (260 vs 175cc), but postoperative outcomes of VTE, UTI, pneumonia, oxygen supplementation requirement, nares MRSA+, cardiac disease, and infection rates between groups were similar. Bivariate logistic regression revealed increased days from COVID+ diagnosis (>6 months) to surgery date were associated with a shorter LOS. Conclusion Although a prior COVID+ diagnosis had increased intraoperative blood loss, there were no significant differences in respiratory, infectious, cardiac, and thromboembolic complications up to six months after elective TJA. This study suggests that asymptomatic C+ patients receiving elective TJA do not require more aggressive prophylactic anticoagulation or antibiotic regimens to prevent VTE or perioperative infections. As institutions around the nation resume pre-COVID rates of arthroplasty surgeries, a prior diagnosis of COVID appears to have no effects on postoperative complications.

Institution of same-day total joint replacement at an urban safety net hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Increasingly, total hip and total knee replacements are being performed at outpatient ambulatory surgery centers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of instituting a same-day surgery program for hip and knee replacement at an urban, safety net hospital. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry for all patients scheduled for same-day total joint replacement at a safety net hospital was performed. Medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, same-day hospital admissions, and 30-day emergency room/hospital admissions. Results: 131 same-day total joint replacements were identified, including 76 knees and 55 hips. Median ASA was 3, and median Charlson comorbidity score was 2. Rate of same-day surgery for total joint replacements increased from 4.5% in September 2020 to 100% in September 2021. On major patient outcomes, 3.8% of patients (n = 5) required conversion to inpatient admission. Rate of 30-Day Emergency Department (ED) visits was 13.0% (n = 17). Most common complaints included postoperative pain (n = 10), incision drainage/edema/hematoma (n = 9), and cellulitis (n = 2). 30-Day Hospital Readmissions occurred in 1.5% of patients (n = 2). Conclusion: Same-day hip and knee replacement can be performed safely at a safety net hospital. Unlike dedicated high-volume orthopedic hospitals or outpatient surgery centers, urban safety net hospitals face a different set of challenges and must care for a wide variety of patients who do not plan for their illness and/or may not be able to pay for their care. Outpatient total joint replacement may extend total joint replacement to patients who might not have access otherwise.

Efficacy of Temperature-Controlled Airflow in Maintaining Ultraclean Conditions throughout the Operating Room

Thirty years of evidence supports the efficacy of ultra-clean air in preventing surgical site infection (SSI). Ultraclean is defined as fewer than 10 Colony Forming Units (CFUs) per cubic meter or <10CFU/m3 (35ft3) However, achieving and maintaining ultraclean conditions in the contemporary operating room has proven challenging. For decades, Laminar Air Flow (LAF) systems were recommended for use in rooms where infection sensitive joint arthroplasty procedures are performed. But, a growing body of evidence has called the efficacy of LAF in prevention of these infections into question. As a result, CD C no longer recommends use of LAF for joint arthroplasty. The WHO has gone a step further issuing a conditional recommendation against its use in these procedures. At the same time, demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties are expected to grow exponentially over the next decade and for reasons that are unclear rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are on the rise. Taken together, these factors suggest that the time has come to rethink management of airborne contamination and ventilation technology in the operating room. Temperature-controlled Air Flow (TcAF) is a novel ventilation technology that has been proven to maintain ultra-clean conditions throughout the entire operating room. TcAF uses continuous HEPA filtration and combines a robust central unidirectional down-flow driven by gravity from a temperature gradient together with mixing ventilation in the periphery of the room. While TcAF has been scientifically validated to maintain ultra-clean conditions of <10CFU/m3(35ft3) throughout the entire operating room, the impact of TcAF on prevention of surgical site infection was unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TcAF on prosthetic joint infection (PJI). A retrospective case control study was performed with 1,000 consecutive cases of primary total joint arthroplasty before and 1,000 consecutive cases after the installation of an ultra-clean TcAF system. TcAF was associated with a statistically significant reduction in surgical site infection. With reduction in surgical site infection proving to be ever more challenging and demand for infection sensitive procedures rising, more rigorous attention to airborne contamination may represent a new pathway to improvement. While not the focus of this paper, the advent of Covid-19 should bring into greater focus the risk of airborne transmission andfurther incentiviņe mitigation.

Technology-enhanced learning in orthopaedics: Virtual reality and multi-modality educational workshops may be effective in the training of surgeons and operating department staff.

AIM: The aims were to assess the utility of: 1) virtual reality-mediated simulation, and 2) a multi-modality 'Bootcamp' in the delivery of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) teaching to orthopaedic surgical trainees. BACKGROUND: Surgical training opportunities are diminished as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic which may result in delays to training completion and gaps in the permanent workforce. Modern and technology-enhanced learning methods have been identified as having the potential to support high-quality and sustainable education. METHODS: This mixed-methods study assessed the educational benefit of two activities designed to teach TKA to junior (ST1-3) orthopaedic trainees. A multi-modality training Bootcamp was delivered that included: virtual reality (VR) and saw-bone simulation; tutorials, and case-based symposia. The VR component was delivered to different participants (surgical trainees, scrub nurses, and consultants) on a further two separate occasions. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected pertaining to utility and performance. RESULTS: Trainees reported that the Bootcamp improved comprehension of arthroplasty principles including component alignment, knee balancing, and intraoperative strategies. Case-based discussions helped develop diagnostic and decision-making skills. The VR activity improved understanding of the surgical process map, increased ability to anticipate steps, and consider the procedure strategically. All staff groups found the VR activity beneficial and would recommend it as a useful addition to a surgical department. CONCLUSION: VR-mediated simulation could augment the education of surgical trainees and scrub team staff by improving comprehension of the surgical process map. Integrated multi-modality 'Bootcamp-style' training activities constructed around trainees' needs may provide a sustainable solution to bridge the experience gap related to reduced exposure to elective orthopaedic practice.

Treatment of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Review).

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head is the main cause of disability in young individuals and incurs major health care expenditure. The lifestyle changes in recent years, especially increased use of hormones and alcohol consumption, has greatly increased the incidence of femoral head necrosis. The underlying causes and risk factors of osteonecrosis of the femoral head are increasingly being elucidated, which has led to the development of novel surgical and non-surgical treatment options. Although the main goal of any treatment method is prevention and delaying the progression of disease, there is no common consensus on the most suitable method of treatment. The present review discussed the latest developments in the etiology and treatment methods for femoral head necrosis.

Symptom management for patients awaiting joint replacement surgery

Joint replacement is very cost-effective and provides long-term improvements in pain, mobility and quality of life for most patients.23 In Australia, more than 105,000 primary and revision hip and knee replacements were performed in 2018, and approximately 35% of these operations were performed in the public sector.45 The projected burden of primary total hip and knee replacement in Australia is expected to increase by 208% and 276%, respectively, by the year 2030.6 Unfortunately, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, a nationwide, temporary suspension of non-urgent elective surgery was implemented. [...]there is evidence that regular low-impact cardiovascular exercise and regular peri-articular strengthening and range-of-motion exercises are beneficial for reducing the symptoms of OA.n>12 GLA: Topical NSAIDs and capsaicin may be beneficial.18'19 Regarding complementary medicines, glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate are no more effective than placebo.20'21 Fish oils and turmeric have mild anti-inflammatory effects, but there is insufficient evidence to support their use.9 Injections Intra-articular injections of cortisone may provide temporary symptomatic relief for patients with OA.9 These are commonly used in the knee and may be administered with or without imaging guidance. Online patient education resources for osteoarthritis management Understanding osteoarthritis * Osteoarthritis Australia - My Joint Pain, www.myjointpain.org.au * Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) - Patients, www.oarsi.org/patients Chronic pain management * NSW Government Agency for Clinical Innovation - Brainman Pain Management Resources, www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/ie/projects/brainman * This Way Up - Chronic Pain - Reboot, https://thiswayup.org.au/how-we-can-help/courses/ chronic-pain Home-based joint exercises * GLA:

Preoperative patients' health decrease moderately, while hospital costs increase for hip and knee replacement due to the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was a comparison between osteoarthritis patients with primary hip and knee replacements before, during and after the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany. Patients' preoperative health status is assumed to decrease, owing to delayed surgeries. Costs for patients with osteoarthritis were assumed to increase, for example, due to higher prices for protective equipment. Hence, a comparison of patients treated before, during and after the first lockdown is conducted. METHODS: In total, 852 patients with primary hip or knee replacement were included from one hospital in Germany. Preoperative health status was measured with the WOMAC Score and the EQ-5D-5L. Hospital unit costs were calculated using a standardised cost calculation. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Chi-squared tests were applied for the statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean of the preoperative WOMAC Score was slightly higher (p < 0.01) for patients before the first lockdown, compared with patients afterwards. Means of the EQ-5D-5L were not significantly different regarding the lockdown status (NS). Length of stay was significantly reduced by approximately 1 day (p < 0.001). Total inpatient hospital unit costs per patient and per day were significantly higher for patients during and after the first lockdown (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative health, measured with the WOMAC Score, worsened slightly for patients after the first lockdown compared with patients undergoing surgery before COVID-19. Preoperative health, measured using the EQ-5D-5L, was unaffected. Inpatient hospital unit costs increased significantly with the COVID-19 pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, III.

Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol at a safety net hospital : a silver lining to COVID-19?

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate whether an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) for arthroplasty established during the COVID-19 pandemic at a safety net hospital can be associated with a decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) and an increase in same-day discharges (SDDs) without increasing acute adverse events. METHODS: A retrospective review of 124 consecutive primary arthroplasty procedures performed after resuming elective procedures on 11 May 2020 were compared to the previous 124 consecutive patients treated prior to 17 March 2020, at a single urban safety net hospital. Revision arthroplasty and patients with < 90-day follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome measures were hospital LOS and the number of SDDs. Secondary outcome measures included 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and 30day emergency department (ED) visits. RESULTS: The mean LOS was significantly reduced from 2.02 days (SD 0.80) in the pre-COVID cohort to 1.03 days (SD 0.65) in the post-COVID cohort (p < 0.001). No patients in the pre-COVID group were discharged on the day of surgery compared to 60 patients (48.4%) in the post-COVID group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in 90-day complications (13.7% (n = 17) vs 9.7% (n = 12); p = 0.429), 30-day ED visits (1.6% (n = 2) vs 3.2% (n = 4); p = 0.683), or 90-day readmissions (2.4% (n = 3) vs 1.6% (n = 2); p = 1.000) between the pre-COVID and post-COVID groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Through use of an ERP, arthroplasty procedures were successfully resumed at a safety net hospital with a shorter LOS and increased SDDs without a difference in acute adverse events. The resulting increase in healthcare value therefore may be considered a 'silver lining' to the moratorium on elective arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic. These improved efficiencies are expected to continue in post-pandemic era. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(10):871-878.

Should we operate on all patients with COVID-19 and proximal femoral fractures? An analysis of thirty, sixty, and ninety day mortality rates based on patients' clinical presentation and comorbidity: a multicentric study in Northern Italy.

PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate 30-60-90-day mortality of operated proximal femur fractures (PFFs) suffering from COVID-19 and correlation with patients' clinical presentation and comorbidities. METHODS: Between February 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, patients with COVID-19 infection and surgically treated PFF were included. Patients' demographic characteristics, oxygen (O2) therapy, comorbidities, and AO type fracture were collected. Chi-square test or Fisher test and hazard ratio were used to assessing the correlation between mortality rate, patient characteristics, and COVID-19 status. Kaplan-Meyer curve was used to analyze 30-60-90-day mortality. Level of significance was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (mean age of 82.7 ± 8.85 years) were included. Thirty-day mortality rate was 5%, which increased to 21% at 60 days and 90 days. Eleven patients died, eight due to AO type A-like and three due to AO type B-like fractures. No significant difference in mortality rate between patients with cardiopulmonary comorbidity or no cardiopulmonary comorbidity was found (p = 0.67); a significant difference in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or history of pulmonary embolism (PE) and patients without COPD was found (p = 0.0021). A significant difference between asymptomatic/mild symptomatic COVID-19 status and symptomatic COVID-19 status was found (p = 0.0415); a significant difference was found for O2 therapy with < 4 L/min and O2 therapy ≥ 4 L/min (p = 0.0049). CONCLUSION: Thirty-day mortality rate of COVID-19 infection and PFFs does not differ from mortality rate of non-COVID-19 PFFs. However, patients with pre-existing comorbidities and symptomatic COVID-19 infection requiring a high volume of O2 therapy have a higher incidence of 60-90-day mortality when surgically treated.

Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on arthroplasty services and early experience after resuming surgeries at a 'non Covid' center.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of Covid-19 crisis on hip and knee joint replacement surgeries at a high volume tertiary care hospital in the Indian National Capital Region and to evaluate the early experience of resumption of arthroplasty services. METHODS: Institutional records of the arthroplasty cases, operated between 1st March to 31 August of 2019 (Group A, pre-Covid) and 2020 (Group B, pandemic year) were compared retrospectively over numerous parameters including the complications within six weeks of surgery. RESULTS: There was a significant drop (by 82.53 %) in the total number of arthroplasty surgeries in Group B (62) as compared with Group A (355). Average number of arthroplasties per month were 59.17 ± 12.93 and 10.67 ± 13.29 in Group A and Group B respectively (p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in postoperative complication rate 7/355 (1.97 %) in Group A vs 7/62 (11.29 %) in Group B during pandemic (p < 0.002), along with a higher 30-days mortality rate 2/355 (3.22 %) vs 2/62 (0.56 %). Pandemic year also saw an increased readmission rate (4.83 %) vs (0.56 %) and postoperative ICU transfer rate (1.61 %) vs (0.56 %) in comparison with pre-Covid year. CONCLUSION: In the pandemic, arthroplasty services got severely affected at our center. With nearly six fold increase in complication rates, higher 30-days mortality and increased readmission rates, caution is advised in resuming arthroplasty surgeries without robust evaluation of cases. Whether undetected Covid-19 infection or poor pre-existing disease control due to lockdown can be linked to these results is a matter of further research with larger multicenter studies.

Converting hip and knee arthroplasty cases to same-day surgery due to COVID-19.

AIMS: In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic meant that proceeding with elective surgery was restricted to minimize exposure on wards. In order to maintain throughput of elective cases, our hospital (St Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Canada) was forced to convert as many cases as possible to same-day procedures rather than overnight admission. In this retrospective analysis, we review the cases performed as same-day arthroplasty surgeries compared to the same period in the previous 12 months. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasties over a three-month period between October and December in 2019, and again in 2020, in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient demographics, number of outpatient primary arthroplasty cases, length of stay for admissions, 30-day readmission, and complications were collated. RESULTS: In total, 428 patient charts were reviewed for October to December of 2019 (n = 195) and 2020 (n = 233). Of those, total hip arthroplasties (THAs) comprised 60% and 58.8% for 2019 and 2020, respectively. Demographic data was comparable with no statistical difference for age, sex, contralateral joint arthroplasty, or BMI. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I was more highly prevalent in the 2020 cohort (5.1-times increase; n = 13 vs n = 1). Degenerative disc disease and fibromyalgia were less significantly prevalent in the 2020 cohort. There was a significant increase in same day discharges for non-direct anterior approach THAs (two-times increase) and total knee arthroplasty (ten-times increase), with a reciprocal decrease in next day discharges. There were significantly fewer reported superficial wound infections in 2020 (5.6% vs 1.7%) and no significant differences in readmissions or emergency department visits (3.1% vs 3.0%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic meant that hospitals and patients were hopeful to minimize the exposure to the wards, and minimize strain on the already taxed inpatient beds. With few positives during the COVID-19 crisis, the pandemic was the catalyst to speed up the outpatient arthroplasty programme that has resulted in our institution being more efficient, and with no increase in readmissions or early complications. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(7):545-551.

Statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic phase III randomised controlled trial examining behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacements: the PEP-TALK trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) are two highly successful orthopaedic procedures that reduce pain for people with osteoarthritis. Previous evidence suggests that physical activity, at best, remains the same pre- to post-operatively, and in some instances declines. The PEP-TALK trial evaluates the effects of a group-based, behaviour change intervention on physical activity following a THR or TKR. METHODS: PEP-TALK is an open, phase III, pragmatic, multi-centre, parallel, two-arm, two-way superiority randomised controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of usual care plus a behaviour change therapy compared with usual care alone following primary THR or TKR. The primary outcome is the UCLA Activity Score at 12 months post-randomisation which will be analysed using a linear mixed effects model. Secondary outcomes measured at 6 months and 12 months after randomisation include the UCLA Activity Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, Oxford Hip/Knee Score, Numerical Rating Scale for Pain, Generalised Self-Efficacy Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L index and EQ-VAS and complications or adverse events. Full details of the planned analysis approaches for the primary and secondary outcomes, as well as the planned sensitivity analyses to be undertaken due to the COVID-19 pandemic, are described here. The PEP-TALK study protocol has been published previously. DISCUSSION: This paper provides details of the planned statistical analyses for the PEP-TALK trial. This is aimed to reduce the risk of outcome reporting bias and enhance transparency in reporting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials database, ISRCTN Number: 29770908 . Registered on October 2018.

The effect of COVID-19 restrictions on rehabilitation and functional outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty during the first wave of the pandemic.

AIMS: The primary aim was to assess the patient-perceived effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 on rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Secondary aims were to assess perceived restrictions, influence on mental health, and functional outcome compared to patients undergoing surgery without restriction. METHODS: During February and March 2020, 105 patients underwent THA (n = 48) or TKA (n = 57) and completed preoperative and six-month postoperative assessments. A cohort of 415 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 were used as the control. Patient demographic data, BMI, comorbidities, Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Knee Score (OKS), and EuroQoL five-domain (EQ-5D) score were collected preoperatively and at six months postoperatively. At six months postoperatively, the 2020 patients were also asked to complete a questionnaire relating to the effect of the social restrictions on their outcome and their mental health. RESULTS: Nearly half of the patients (47.6%, n = 50/105) felt that the restrictions imposed by COVID-19 had limited their rehabilitation and were associated with a significantly worse postoperative OKS (p < 0.001), EQ-5D score (p < 0.001), and lower satisfaction rate (p = 0.019). The reasons for the perceived limited rehabilitation were: being unable to exercise (n = 32, 64%), limited access to physiotherapy (n = 30, 60%), and no face-to-face follow-up (n = 30, 60%). A quarter (n = 26) felt that their mental health had deteriorated postoperatively; 17.1% (n = 18) felt depressed and 26.7% (n = 28) felt anxious. Joint-specific scores and satisfaction for the 2020 group were no different to the 2019 group, however patients undergoing THA in 2020 had a significantly worse postoperative EQ-5D compared to the 2019 cohort (difference 0.106; p = 0.001) which was not observed in patients undergoing TKA. CONCLUSION: Half of the 2020 cohort felt that their rehabilitation had been limited and was associated with worse postoperative Oxford and EQ-5D scores, and lower rates of patient satisfaction, but relative to the 2019 cohort their overall outcomes were no different, with the exception of THA patients who had a worse general health score. Level of evidence: Prospective study, Level 2 Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(6):380-387.